A property inventory is the catalogue of a rental property and all its contents. The Schedule of Condition is a record of the condition of all these items. Usually the property inventory and Schedule Condition are combined into a single report, so therefore referred to as either, or both.
A property inventory / Schedule of Condition has several functions:
Before the advent of the Tenancy Deposit Scheme many landlords didn't bother making a property inventory, or if they did, it was a few scribbled notes on a scrap of paper. The fact was, prior to the Tenancy Deposit Scheme landlords were free to be both ‘judge and jury’ when it came to repaying a tenants deposit. The rental deposit was held by them and if the tenant didn't like it then they would have to come and get it. The power was all in the landlord's hands.
It's not to say that tenants had no remedies. If a tenant felt aggrieved with a landlords decision on how much of their deposit they were getting back, under the pre April 6 2007 system they were able to take the landlord to court to argue they thought that they were unreasonably withholding their deposit. The judge would then decide on the merits of the tenants claims. However, the ‘hassle’ and inconvenience to the tenant of carrying this through, meant that in most cases tenants didn't bother to take matters any further, particularly if relatively smalls sums were involved.
The Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) changed the cosy amateur approach to preparing a property inventory in several ways:
1. The landlord no longer controlled the deposit monies
2. Tenants have been emboldened to take on the landlord if they think they even have a chance of winning the argument over a deposit claim. There has been a large jump in the number of cases where the tenant disputes the withholding of all or part of their rent deposit
3. The property inventory has become the key document in proving the condition of the rental property before a tenant moves in
4. The way of assessing disputes over a tenant's deposit has changed. Rather than matters being resolved through the courts, they are mostly decided by independent arbitrators. Arbitration is generally seen as less adversarial and more fixed by legal procedure than the courts.
The Tenancy Deposit Scheme has shifted power over the tenant's deposit away from the landlord. This has transformed the importance of making a clear and accurate recording of a rental property. A well prepared property inventory including an accurated record of its condition needs to be made at both the ‘check in’ and ‘check out’ of a tenancy.
The vast majority of landlords managing their rental properties prepare their own property inventories. It isn’t ‘rocket science’. However, to make a thorough inventory does take some time.
A landlord needs to be thorough and methodical, and having a well set out pro-forma inventory form helps in the preparation process by clearly setting out the key areas that need to be covered by landlords.
Our free property management software offers a bespoke form that users can use and adapt to their own specific properties, the data is then saved and ready to be edited for the next time - read more here - FREE Property Inventory Form Software.
Depending on the size of a rental property, a thorough inventory will take a minimum of an hour. A rush ten minute job, probably won't be good enough to meet the burden of proof in any tenancy deposit dispute. Recently a lawyer who acts regularly for landlords reported that 1 in 50 inventories are of an adequate standard to ‘stand up’ in court. Be warned.
There are two ways of avoiding the inventory preparation process.
Firstly, if the property is fully managed by an agent then inventory taking and the subsequent ‘check out’ should be carried out by them as one of their management duties. This obviously will save a landlord time. It will also mean that if there are problems with the condition or cleanliness of the property; the agent should rectify these and use the deposit monies to cover this expense before handing the balance back to the tenant.
One thing to be aware of when employing an agent is that legally they act as the landlords’ representative. This means that whilst they may hold the deposit monies, legally it is still the responsibility of the landlord and if the agent goes bust or runs off with the money, the landlord still has to repay the tenant their deposit back. Tenants who take legal action to recover their monies have been directed to take it against the landlord because judges have ruled that there is no privity of contract between the agent and tenant.
This is why it is so important that landlords should always ensure that any letting agent holds their deposits in a trust account or is a member of a suitable bonded scheme such as the one run by the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA). In this way should the agent go bust the deposit monies will always be available to the landlord to repay the tenant with.
The second way to get around having to prepare an inventory is to employ a specialist Inventory Clerk. For a list of inventory clerks visit the Association of Independant Inventory Clerks (AIIC). or vist our Inventory Links page. These individuals carry out the whole process for you; they can also do the mid tenancy inspection as well as the final ‘check out’. The downside to this service is that it is not cheap. The costs of a check in and check out run to about £100-140 each for a standard 2 bed flat. These fees do vary, depending on the size of the property and area of the country (London will be the most expensive).
For this a landlord will have the piece of mind that the inventory has been done professionally and comprehensively. It is possible to pass on the cost of this service to the tenants. This is quite common practice where an agent is used. However there are no hard and fast rules and the agent could equally pass on the cost of this service to the landlord. It is therefore important for a landlord to be clear from the outset about what their letting and management fees include before signing up for their service.
The most essential thing about preparing an inventory is to adopt a system that is simple so that it is easily remembered and replicated. This will ensure that the landlord achieves consistent results. In developing your system ensure that the inventory it produces is:
The best way of producing inventories that achieve the key points given above is to divide any property into a series of rooms. This is largely straight forward; for instance most properties will have a kitchen, lounge, bedrooms, etc. However a landlord will also have to categorise some parts of the property as a room such as hallways, a conservatory, gardens, garages, etc. Once you have established a list of these rooms; it is then a case of subdividing them into a series of component parts. These component parts once categorised will build up an overall framework.
The standard component parts used in the Property Hawk inventory are as follows:
As well as the standard component parts each room may have individual parts specific to that room; these must also be noted down. Once all these parts have been recorded, the next stage is to record items that are not fixtures or fittings. This is particularly important and time consuming where a property is furnished. In this case it will be necessary to note down every item supplied. Once this is done; you will have a complete inventory.
The next stage is to complete what is known as the schedule of condition. This can be carried out concurrently with the inventory. The object of the process is to note down the condition of each component part.
For example, in the case of the lounge under the component part of doors you would record the fact that there are two doors, newly white painted with chrome handles. This part of the process is particularly important because as I go on to discuss later it is disputes over the condition of items and what is ‘fair wear and tear’ that are the most common. This aspect is far more difficult to prove than the removal of an item and it is fair to say that judges will often side with the tenant unless the landlord can prove conclusively that it was new or in good condition. This highlights the importance of retaining receipts not only for tax purposes but also in case of a disagreement with your tenant resulting in arbitration or court action where you will then have to prove the condition of your property at ‘handover’.
Many inventory clerks use a series of abbreviations to speed up the process. This is fine providing that a full list of terms accompanying the inventory. Whilst abbreviations are useful they can also be confusing for the tenant who will need to verify the report once it is completed.
The important things for a landlord to ensure are:
A landlord should avoid at all costs ambiguous language such as ‘spotlessly clean’ or emotive language so as ‘lovely fireplace’. Keep descriptions brief and factual.
If a landlord follows these guidelines then they should end up with a comprehensive written inventory and schedule of condition that will then cover you for all eventualities.
It might appear that with the arrival of cameras on mobile phones and cheap video technology that the use of a written inventory has become somewhat outdated. Surely now it’s a case of the landlord just snapping a few pictures of the condition of your investment property; after all ‘pictures speak louder than a thousand words’.
Unfortunately when it comes to it things aren’t that simple. For a start to form part of the inventory for evidential purposes photographs will need to be conclusively proved and agreed by all parties at the outset. This has to be done by landlord/agent and tenants signing two copies of all items (each keeps one set) or each party signing separate full sets, which are then exchanged on completion (grant of letting)- just like conveyance/duplicate or lease/counterpart. Alternatively it is possible to incorporate sets into the tenancy agreement. In this case, the landlord should include an extra clause reading something like, "The Landlord and the Tenant agree that the attached [photographs][Schedules] show the state and condition of the [property][premises] as at the commencement of the tenancy."
All of this does not sound too problematic. This is until you consider one of the practical difficulties involved with photographic evidence. Consider for a moment how many individual photographs would be required to comprehensively cover a whole property. Even for a relatively small two bed flat the number could easily stretch into the hundreds. The tenant is then faced with the incredibly laborious process of checking the veracity of each pair of photos and countersigning them all on move-in day. On top of this there are the practical difficulties of photos & video being sufficiently clear to show things like scuff marks or dirt. Natural lighting will generally have to be very good for these to show. The trouble is, unless the natural light is good, the flash usually bleaches out images, along with any 'nuances' of grime. If you the landlord then has to review each photo and then adjust the balance, exposure etc, they'll be there for hours - I speak from experience. Also the landlord will need to make sure that there is a hard copy date on each of the photos which are important in verifying when the photos were taken. Otherwise the tenant could use a defence that the photos were taken at a time prior to their occupation.
Legally both photographic and video evidence is admissible in court. One of the difficulties of using them is establishing their authenticity i.e. when they were taken and that they have not been doctored. Therefore, where video or an electronic copy of a collection of photographs is taken on a CD or DVD then you are advised to write this on to a CD ROM. These discs cannot be rewritten or doctored with once written which is important when verifying the evidence. A landlord needs to ensure that where a hard copy is made that they give the tenant one and get them to sign to confirm that they have received it and agree with the contents.
The upshot is that photographic and video evidence may not be the panacea that it initially may suggest. This probably explains why its’ adoption by landlords and agents has only been limited to date. The reality is that landlords should concentrate on ensuring an accurate written is prepared and signed by all parties. Photographic evidence where it is used is probably best used selectively and in conjunction with a detailed written inventory to support and highlight its’ contents.
The check in occurs at the point that the tenancy has been agreed and the landlord is in a position to hand over the keys. It is the process by where the tenant and landlord / agent who should have a fully prepared inventory / statement of condition will need to agree the cleanliness of the property as well as confirm the details of the inventory. The process involves a tour of the property. Where there are discrepancies between the original inventory then these should be noted down. Once an acceptable copy has been drawn up the landlord and tenant must sign and date it to acknowledge that the document is a fair representation of the facts. The property inventory then forms part of the terms of the tenancy agreement. When photos are involved they need to be signed and dated or referred to as a clause in the tenancy agreement.
The mid term inspection is one carried out by the landlord or their agent approximately halfway through a tenancy to ensure that the property is being maintained. Generally it is a short visit and the landlord or agent should use the agreed inventory to cross check the property that an unreasonable amount of damage has not occurred and that the property is being cleaned. It can also be a useful way of the landlord finding out about any small problems with the property which the tenant has failed to report. In this way the landlords should be in a position to take pre-emptive action to tackle an issue before it gets too serious. The first mid term inspection is also a way of the landlord checking on the tenant and making a judgement as to whether they are happy for the tenancy to continue or whether they wish to proceed to issue a section 21 notice requiring possession.
This is the final stage of any tenancy and the point when the benefits of having a well prepared inventory become apparent. It may be that many months has elapsed since the start of the tenancy which means unless you are blessed with a photographic memory the original condition of the property at the time of the ‘check in’ is likely to be ‘hazey’ at best. The landlord should arrange to meet the tenant at the property to go through the property inventory and check its condition at the time that they are ready to move out. Ensure that you allow yourself plenty of time to conduct a thorough inspection. Use a copy of the original property inventory to note down any item of damage or cleanliness. The landlord must be careful to make accurate and thorough notes as these could form part of your case should a dispute arise and go to court or arbitration.
I’m afraid it is not uncommon for tenants to swap some of the smaller items of supplied furnishings (curtains, lampshades, pillows, for example) for their own. I don’t have a problem with this as long as the tenant then puts back these items at the end of the tenancy. What landlords don’t want is that the tenant swaps their ‘rubbish’ with your good stuff. This is why it is so important when preparing the inventory to
fully describe each item, quoting colour size, model and serial numbers, where possible
even code mark your items with say a unique indelible mark.
Gaining unwanted ‘stuff’ is sometimes more of a problem than loosing items or having them replaced by inferior goods. My experience particularly with students and sharers is that tenants can use moving as an opportunity to discard their unwanted belongings. I’m sure that they think that they are being very generous and if you are an avid ‘car booter’ it can provide a continuous supply of delightful ‘bric-a-brac’. Unfortunately I’m not, and it is very time consuming and expensive to get rid of items; particularly larger ones such as furniture and appliances. Local authorities will generally take large domestic items away for a small fee of about £15; but why should you have to organise and pay for the removal of somebody else’s rubbish! I had a recent a case where a tenant left me their car. Look out in particular for stuff being left in the cellar, attic and garage. These are all convenient hiding places often used by tenants to dump their unwanted hoard. My advice to landlords is, don’t agree the ‘check out’ until the property is ‘completely’ cleared to your satisfaction.
One thing to note is that it is not necessary for the tenant to be present when the ‘check out’ is being compiled. Some landlords or agents actually prefer this to be the case because it allows them to concentrate on taking accurate and unbiased notes without having to answer directly to the tenant.
The completed ‘check out’ statement can then be posted out to the tenant or a subsequent arrangement can be made to meet them to go through it if there are any areas of disagreement. Otherwise the tenant can post a signed copy of the ‘check out’ statement back. The downside to this two stage approach is that it is more time consuming as it requires that the landlord or agent have to make an additional journey to meet the tenant should there be any disagreement. My advice would always be for a landlord to agree the ‘check out’ at the property and on the day the tenant moves out. This way landlords are also more likely to get a signed copy of it back; than if they have to rely on the tenants remembering to post it to them. If the tenant does refuse to sign on the spot insisting on more time to consider the form, then this could be a warning that they will contest a landlords statement. This should prompt a landlord to make sure that their descriptions are completely accurate and that all evidence is gathered and verified.
One thing to note is that it is not necessary for the tenant to be present when the ‘check out’ is being compiled. Some landlords or agents prefer that this to be the case because it allows them to concentrate on taking accurate and unbiased notes without having to answer directly to the tenant. The completed ‘check out’ statement can then be posted out to the tenant or a subsequent arrangement can be made to meet them to go through it if there are any areas of disagreement. Otherwise the tenant can post a signed copy of the ‘check out’ statement back. The downside to this two stage approach is that it is more time consuming as it requires that the landlord or agent have to make an additional journey to meet the tenant should there be any disagreement. My advice would always be to agree the ‘check out’ at the property and on the day the tenant moves out. This way you are also more likely to get a signed copy of it back; than if you have to rely on the tenants remembering to post it to you. If the tenant does refuse to sign on the spot insisting on more time to consider the form, then this could be a warning that they will contest your statement. This should prompt you to make sure that your descriptions are completely accurate and that all evidence is gathered and verified.
The most common disagreements at the time of ‘check out’ occur around the topic of what constitutes ‘fair wear and tear’ of a rental property. It’s quite easy to decide on whether a bathroom cabinet is present or the cooker works. What is more difficult and subjective is whether the marks on the bedroom carpet are just a result of several years of use or red wine stains from exuberant parties. There is nothing in statute which defines ‘fair wear and tear’; the concept is too wide ranging to be enshrined in law. The Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) has however produced some useful guidelines for its members on what to consider when coming to a view on it. These are:
Legally a landlord should not end up, either financially or materially in a better position than he was in at the commencement of the tenancy or than he would have been at the end of the tenancy having allowed for 'fair wear and tear'. It follows therefore (and is an established legal tenet) that a landlord is not entitled to charge his tenants the full cost for having any part of his rental property, or any fixture or fitting “put back to the condition it was at the start of the tenancy.” This would constitute betterment; appropriate remedies available to the landlord might range from:
There is a technique for taking into account fair wear and tear and also avoiding betterment and it is called apportionment. Apportionment is the process of breaking down the costs of ‘fair wear and tear’ into measurable chunks and thereby allowing you to assign a monetary value to items in what can appear to be a very subjective process. It is probably best illustrated by way of some very general examples:
1. Minor damage to an item, a small to medium stain or mark on a carpet or mattress etc – perhaps £15 - £35 e.g. the cost of a “spot” clean or, this amount as the tenant’s contribution to a full clean of the whole item, or as compensation for the diminution. A small to medium size chip or mark, scratch or burn on a kitchen worktop – perhaps £5 - £25. A landlord could of course decide to a purchase a new item, to have a new carpet put down or a new kitchen worktop installed if they wished, but they cannot lawfully charge the tenant for the full cost. The costs should be apportioned and shared between the parties on the principles given above. E.g. cost of new carpet £500 – apportioned £465 to landlord, £35 to tenant.
2. In the rare circumstances where damage ( to the worktop/carpet/mattress/ item etc) is so extensive or severe so as to affect the achievable rent level/lettability or quality of the property the most appropriate remedy might be replacement and to apportion costs according to the age and useful lifespan of the item. Below is an example of how this might be calculated.
(a) Cost of similar replacement carpet/item = £500-00
(b) Actual age of existing carpet/item = 2 years
(c) Average useful lifespan of that type of carpet/item = 10 years
(d) Residual lifespan of carpet/item calculated as (c) less (b) = 8 years
(e) Depreciation of value rate calculated as (a) divided by (c) £50 per year
(f) Reasonable apportionment cost to tenant calculated as (d) times (e)= £400.00
Prior to the Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) the landlord or agent holding the deposit would make a deduction to cover the costs of damage and then would refund the balance to the ex-tenants within 10 working days of the final ‘check out’ being completed. The tenant would then either accept the landlords decision or take the matter to the county court to recover the contested amount. The TDS has changed this for tenancies created after the 6th April 2007. Refer to the section on the Tenancy Deposit Scheme ( TDS ) for detailed guidance of what happens now.
FORMS FOR LETTING PROPERTY
FINANCE AND TAX ON RENTAL PROPERTY
RENTAL PROPERTY REGULATIONS
INVESTING IN BTL PROPERTY
WHICH PERIOD OF PROPERTY
BUYING OFF PLAN
KNOWING THE RISKS
PROPERTY INVESTMENT CLUBS
MANAGING RENTAL PROPERTY
GIVING NOTICE TO LEAVE
NON - PAYMENT OF RENT
GETTING YOUR MONEY BACK
THE TENANT WONT MOVE OUT
THE TENANT DOES A BUNK
RAISING THE RENT
REDUCING THE RENT
REPAYING THE TENANCY DEPOSIT
FAIR WEAR AND TEAR
DAMP, MOULD AND CONDENSATION
MAINTENANCE OF A RENTAL PROPERTY
LETTING RENTAL PROPERTY
TEN STEPS TO LETTING
WRITING A LETTING ADVERT
FURNISHING A PROPERTY
LETTING AGENT OR DIY
SELECTING A LETTING AGENT
TENANTS ON BENEFITS
LETTING TO STUDENTS
PREPARING AN INVENTORY
TERMS OF A TENANCY
LENGTH OF A TENANCY
RESPONSIBILITY FOR REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE
TENANCIES IN SCOTLAND
LETTING TO TENANTS WITH PETS
LEGISLATION OF LETTING PROPERTY
TENANCY DEPOSIT DISPUTES
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
HOUSING ACT APPEAL DISPUTES
THE LANDS TRIBUNAL
RIGHTS OF LIGHT APPLICATION
APPEALS FROM LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNALS (LVT's)
POSSESSION - SECTION 8 NOTICE
POSSESSION - SECTION 21 NOTICE
SECTION 21 TIMETABLE AND PROCESS
GROUNDS FOR POSSESSION
HARASSMENT BY LANDLORDS
RENT DISPUTES BETWEEN LANDLORD & TENANT
FAIR RENT (RAC)
MARKET RENT UNDER AST
LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNALS
MODIFICATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS